Hello, Guest! Login or Sign Up!
BOOKMARK
| LANGUAGE:
Lehel's
GARAGE   PHOTOS   BLOGS   COMMENTS   FRIENDS   GROUPS   FAVORITES  


RSS
Gasoline or Diesel.
Posted On: 05/22/08 @ 08:38 AM

I am quickly discovering that you can’t say the smallest, slightest thing in a blog without getting picked up on it so let me do the same, the correct French response to this will be Touché, I think?

 

 

 

 

I will get to that in one moment. I am very glad to report however that one of my blogs did actually entice at least one person to join, and become a member of MyWheelsTVGarage.

 

Back to my previous blog and, JUST A PART of the comment made on it.

 

 

 

 

“Au contraire!  We have in fact only two choices at the pump:  Gasoline or Diesel.  Octane I think would be a varietal of gasoline, no?”

 

 

 

 

Using that argument then, ‘Au Contraire’, again!  

Using that premise, then it’s only ONE choice, unless I’m mistaken both Gasoline AND Diesel are produced originally from the same product, that being crude oil?

 

 

 

 

So we’re both wrong or BOTH right, or perhaps only I’m right.

I think “Varietal” pretty much exclusively refers to grapes though!

 

 

 

 

 

But this did get me thinking. What is Octane?

Always good to know about things that you might not ordinarily give a lot of thought to.

 

 

 

This, courtesy of Wikipedia!

 

 

The octane rating is a measure of the autoignition resistance of gasoline and other fuels used in spark-ignition internal combustion engines. It is a measure of anti-detonation of a gasoline or fuel.

 

 

Octane number is the number which gives the percentage, by volume, of iso-octane in a mixture of iso-octane and normal heptane, that would have the same anti-knocking capacity as the fuel which is under consideration. For example, gasoline with the same knocking characteristics as a mixture of 90% iso-octane and 10% heptane would have an octane rating of 90. [1]

 

 

The octane rating of a spark ignition engine fuel is the knock resistance (anti-knock rating) compared to a mixture of iso-octane (2,2,4-trimethylpentane, an isomer of octane) and n-heptane. By definition, iso-octane is assigned an octane rating of 100 and heptane is assigned an octane rating of zero. An 87-octane gasoline, for example, possesses the same anti-knock rating of a mixture of 87% (by volume) iso-octane and 13% (by volume) n-heptane. This does not mean, however, that the gasoline actually contains these hydrocarbons in these proportions. It simply means that it has the same autoignition resistance as the described mixture.

 

 

A high tendency to autoignite, or low octane rating, is undesirable in a spark ignition engine but desirable in a diesel engine. The standard for the combustion quality of diesel fuel is the cetane number. A diesel fuel with a high cetane number has a high tendency to autoignite, as is preferred.

 

 

It should be noted that octane rating does not relate to the energy content of the fuel (see heating value), nor the speed at which the flame initiated by the spark plug propagates across the cylinder. It is only a measure of the fuel's resistance to autoignition. It is for this reason that one highly branched form, or isomer, of octane (2,2,4-trimethylpentane) has (by definition) an octane rating of 100, whereas n-octane (see octane), which has a linear arrangement of the 8 carbon atoms, has an octane rating of -10, even though the two fuels have exactly the same chemical formula and virtually identical heating values and flame speeds.

 

 

[edit] Measurement methods

 

The most common type of octane rating worldwide is the Research Octane Number (RON). RON is determined by running the fuel in a test engine with a variable compression ratio under controlled conditions, and comparing these results with those for mixtures of iso-octane and n-heptane.

 

 

There is another type of octane rating, called Motor Octane Number (MON) or the aviation lean octane rating, which is a better measure of how the fuel behaves when under load. MON testing uses a similar test engine to that used in RON testing, but with a preheated fuel mixture, a higher engine speed, and variable ignition timing to further stress the fuel's knock resistance. Depending on the composition of the fuel, the MON of a modern gasoline will be about 8 to 10 points lower than the RON. Normally fuel specifications require both a minimum RON and a minimum MON.

 

 

In most countries (including all of Europe and Australia) the "headline" octane that would be shown on the pump is the RON, but in the United States, Canada and some other countries the headline number is the average of the RON and the MON, sometimes called the Anti-Knock Index (AKI), Road Octane Number (RdON), Pump Octane Number (PON), or (R+M)/2. Because of the 8 to 10 point difference noted above, this means that the octane in the United States will be about 4 to 5 points lower than the same fuel elsewhere: 87 octane fuel, the "regular" gasoline in the US and Canada, would be 91-92 in Europe. However most European pumps deliver 95 (RON) as "regular", equivalent to 90-91 US (R+M)/2, and even deliver 98 (RON) or 100 (RON).

 

 

The octane rating may also be a "trade name", with the actual figure being higher than the nominal rating.[citation needed]

 

 

It is possible for a fuel to have a RON greater than 100, because iso-octane is not the most knock-resistant substance available. Racing fuels, straight ethanol, AvGas and liquified petroleum gas (LPG) typically have octane ratings of 110 or significantly higher - ethanol's RON is 129 (MON 102, AKI 116) reference[1]. Typical "octane booster" additives include tetra-ethyl lead, MTBE and toluene. Tetra-ethyl lead is easily decomposed to its component radicals, which react with the radicals from the fuel and oxygen that would start the combustion, thereby delaying ignition. This is why leaded gasoline has a higher octane rating than unleaded.

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: Octane



Bookmark:



Viewing 1 - 1 out of 1 Comments

05/22/08 @ 12:40 PM
No, I suppose you're correct that both derive from the same source, but my comment was in response to the choices AT the pump, as framed by your blog...  The continued boiling-down and distilling of the topic simply serves to delve deeper into the metrics, chemistry & history of each choice available - a good thing.



The RON/OCTANE conversion is complex - my old VeeDubs state a minimum of 98 RON on the fuel requirements, and at US pumps today, the introduction of additives and Ethanol, most recently, pose interesting technical challenges to burn the fuel efficiently and fully.  It is however possible to make these old engines work better on modern fuels, by engineering the cylinder heads and carburetor jetting to lower compression ratios.   I've done this by machining the cylinder heads to a "semi-hemi" combustion chamber (see, your RAM and my VW THING have something in common), which in effect increases the volumetric efficiency of each cylinder, while lowering the compression ratio slightly, which allows for advanced timing, which ignites the fuel earlier, so it can burn for longer and thus more completely (producing more work).  Also, this means I can lean out the fuel mixture a bit, and run lower octane fuel, which actually produces more power and efficiency than high-octane fuel.  I've combined this with sodium-filled valves, capable of higher temperatures, and an "extractor" exhaust system, which means each header pipe is the same length and there is no scavenging of exhaust gasses (which can affect how efficiently an engine burns fuel).  The result is a cool-running engine (excessive heat further reduces engine efficiency) capable of reasonably high MPG.  Everything is blueprinted and balanced to reduce vibration and friction, too.




This, hopefully, might address your implication that my "old" vehicle is a smog-spewing machine.  I don't have the exact emissions numbers handy, but it's well within the acceptable range for say, a modern engine.   (lost the paperwork in the move, but will find it at some point)




The only other thing I could do would be to install a catalytic converter, but that would perhaps decrease the efficiency of the engine because of the added backpressure it would introduce to the pretty simple combustion cycle.




Probably more information than you wanted, but I'm simply trying to explain that no, I'm not a hypocrite by driving an old vehicle that pollutes more than say, your truck.  I've put a lot of though, research, time & money into this - and it works.  It's also fun to maintain a car almost entirely from recycled/used parts.




-g















© 2008 Automotive Networks Corporation

www.wheelstv.com or wheelstv.com has moved to WheelsTV.net: The #1 Network of multi-format automotive programming!